One of the workshops at
the Conference on Honduras last week was on cultural differences, a subject I
have much interest in now that I live here. It gave me lots to think about, including if there are times when a
country really ought to consider whether certain aspects of its culture are
hindering progress.
That probably sounds
like a very colonial thing to say. History is littered with countries scarred
by invasive cultures that arrived uninvited and proceeded to try to change
everything.
I´m not endorsing that
practice. But surely there´s no harm in a population checking in with its
culture from time to time to see if it´s still serving the country well.
Understanding the less
obvious aspects of Honduras culture is still a work in progress for me. I´ve
found the country to be surprisingly welcoming and warm to a foreigner who´s
only now getting a grip on the language. But I can´t say as I´ve warmed to
everything about life in Honduras.
What I heard at the
workshop reinforced some of my personal experiences: That the culture hates
conflict to the point that lies are acceptable if they´re done to avoid an unpleasant
situation; that nothing is a sure thing even if you´ve got a signed document
saying that it is (the woman doing the workshop called that a “high context”
versus a “high contract” culture); that hierarchies are to be respected even
when the actions of the higher-ups in fact ought to land them a smack upside
the head.
Experiencing a different
culture is one of the things I like most about travel, especially the . unspoken aspects that aren´t written down
anywhere but nonetheless govern the way people in the country live their lives.
Travel is an excellent reminder that
there are many ways to live a life.
And if people are for
the most part healthy, happy, hopeful and productive in a particular country, then
clearly the culture is working. There´s no “right” culture in a world where
everybody does things a little differently.
But there´s the rub for
Honduras. Almost 70 per cent of the population lives in poverty, and nobody´s
happy about that. The rich are stinking rich and reluctant to share. The public
school system is plagued by teacher strikes, poorly equipped, and inadequate
for preparing young Hondurans for these global times. The public health-care system is a mess, on
every front from the quality of medical care to the timely distribution of
medicines.
The roads are
disastrous. The murder rate is among the highest in the world. The justice
system is almost non-existent. The spectre of widespread hunger and death is
never far from view, especially now that climate change is threatening the corn
and bean crops that sustain so many rural families. The population is deeply
unhappy, their discouragement revealed in national polls that routinely find the
vast majority have given up on hoping for a better day.
With the exception of
Haiti, Honduras is virtually alone in Latin America in its decline on virtually
every front that citizens of the world use to gauge a happy, healthy life –
income level, employment, overall health, infant mortality, education, stable
and democratic governance. So you´d have to say that things aren´t exactly
going well here.
Culture can´t be blamed
for all of that, of course. But neither can it be dismissed entirely when
thinking about how to improve things in Honduras. You could blame all the
country´s problems on the government, or drug trafficking, or the CIA. But you
still find yourself back at the same root problem - that if there are ever going to be
improvements, the people who live here are simply going to have to get past
some of their cultural tendencies and do things differently.
If you don’t challenge
the hierarchy even when it´s doing stupid stuff, for instance, it continues to
do stupid stuff. Simmering resentment of poor decisions from on high also
breeds passive-aggressive behavior, in
which people agree on the surface but meanwhile register their unhappiness by withdrawing
co-operation.
I see that frequently in my workplace. It´s a
huge hindrance to productivity, and shuts out the people whose input could have
made all the difference in resolving a problem or building a better widget. In the big picture, that cultural quirk also
means government institutions aren´t held accountable, even while public
disillusion grows.
If contracts are viewed
as things to be honoured only when you personally know the people involved
(that´s what “high context” means), that´s a significant hindrance to doing
business with anyone from outside your personal network. Perhaps there was a
time when Hondurans could afford to do business only with the people in their
personal network, but it´s long passed at this point.
As for the culture of
saying whatever comes to mind in the moment to avoid conflict – well, that has
to be revealed as the recipe for conflict that it really is. When I had a conflict
with a Copan bank a few months back, my happiness with the cheery bank
personnel who assured me that I need only
come back tomorrow to have all my problems solved wore thin pretty
quickly when I returned the next day to discover that it wasn´t true. I can´t
imagine how frustrating that cultural practice must be to people caught up in
much grander problems.
There´s much to love
about the many cultures of the world. There´s much to love about Honduras, as
I´m reminded in this very moment as I hear my neighbours gathering outside for
the easy conversations that go on night after night on the street where we
live.
But when a country´s
culture is hurting its citizens more than it helps, something´s got to give.
Sure, the gringos have to adapt, but a country losing ground on all the
measures that count needs to consider its own role in perpetuating problems. Some
things we call culture are really just bad habits.